Democracy??? Tea Party Town Hall Strategy: "Rattle Them," "Stand Up And Shout"
by: The Pardu
March 09, 2010 7:48 PM
Last evening I watched the Rachel Maddow Show. Maddow, via her producers and writers, commented at length about the recurrence of disruptions at Town Hall Meetings.
While the world was markedly different during the American Revolution and resultant U.S. Constitution, I thought about the First Amendment. I contemplated, how the Founding Fathers would have felt about organized and guided disruptions of deliberations and meetings related to the developing Constitution (and subsequent government). My mind went to "dissent'.
Dissent is defined by Webster's dictionary as "to differ in belief or opinion."
Our right to dissent is assured by the first amendment.
It states,
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
So, the Tea Party town hall meeting 'disruptors' are very much within their rights to dissent. (Let me state up-front that most people who associate with the Tea Party Movement are not 'disruptors'.) The next question in my mind? "How can the disruptors feel it is within their rights (to dissent) to show up at open forums with the intent to drown out dialog and information?
Other questions. Where are we headed if the nation segments into camps based in socio/political dogma - RIGHT AND LEFT? Is it truly democrat to practice emailing guidelines,and hiring professionals, to possibly agitate an already concerned and maybe angry audience. (death panels!!! was the battle cry. from the RIGHT).
After a brief set of words related to a town hall meeting in a St. Louis, MO suburb, I have posted the actual Right Principles (a guide to disrupting town hall meetings). The following exert is not related to boisterous disruptions; it is an exert of an article that focuses on one Republican Congressman's 'flip' conducting of his meeting as he states intended humorous remarks about how other legislators were treated in their meetings.
http://www.examiner.com/x-15877-Kansas-City-Young-Democrat-Examiner~y2009m8d7-Orchestrated-outrage-fake-protesters-disrupt-healthcare-town-hall-meetings
At a town hall meeting in St. Louis, where he did not take questions, Representative Todd Akin (R-MO) joked that democratic lawmakers "almost got lynched" by angry protesters. The audience responded with applause. Representative Akin added that the GOP does not "approve of lynchings" while making a choking motion that prompted laughter from the crowd. Clearly in bad taste, the joke seems particularly off-putting considering that, Congressman Bishop (D-NY) was escorted to his car by five police officers for his own safety after a town hall meeting, Representative Brad Miller (D-NC) has received a direct threat against his life, and Representative Frank Kratovil (D-MD) was hung in effigy by a healthcare protester.
Perhaps foreshadowing fear mongering at its best, Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) stated "Fear, I would say, precedes anger, and I think there are a lot of people who tell me they are scared of what they see coming out of Washington...I see real opportunities for us."
I have to ask, "What is that about". Is that democracy at work? Why should I not think back to Germany 1933 and the rise of the 'brown shirts'? My point relates to suppression of free and open speech, not the coming of the Third Reich per se.
I ask that some LEFTAKERS read the following document, and help me understand why this is the right way show opposition to health care reform (Or bills that were being developed in Congress).
http://www.rightprinciples.com/
The specific link of the document that is called "The Memo"
http://www.rightprinciples.com...
THE RIGHTS PRINCIPLES
Rocking the Town Halls - Best Practices
A Political Action Memo
We here in Fairfield County Connecticut conducted an action at Congressman Jim Himes's Town Hall meeting in May 2009. We believe there are some best practices which emerged from the event and our experience, which could be useful to activists in just about any district where their Congressperson has supported the socialist agenda of the Democrat leadership in Washington.
Our objective was to "pack the hall" with as many of our people ready to challenge the Congressman, put him on the defensive, and give him a reality check from we-the-people. We were successful in organizing about 30 people and we spread out among the crowd of about 150 people in the hall. We used some techniques early on which immediately made Himes uncomfortable, and several of us got our chance at the microphone to ask questions. Himes clearly left the hall staggered, as the meeting, billed as a progress report for his economic solutions, clearly did not go as he had planned.
We humbly submit the following as a potential playbook to conduct similar events to achieve similar outcomes in most any targeted district.
Organize for Success
- Alert people in the district to watch for the first announcement of a Town Hall - there may be as little as a week's notice. Have a central person advised so that the alert can be distributed to as many potential supporters as possible.
- The organizer should go to www.votesmart.org and obtain the Rep's voting record. It can be copied, pasted into Word, cleaned up, highlighted and readied for distribution.
- Questions should be prepared. Most pols are pros at deflecting off-the-cuff questions. The questions should contain facts and numbers (which are embarrassing and damning to the Rep and his voting record). They can run up to five sentences or so - you will not be cut off at that length. The questions should put the Rep on the defensive and demand a specific answer. Also, anticipate the evasive, deflective answer and be prepared with a quick follow-up. The questions should personalize the Rep e.g. why did YOU vote for a budget that immediately carried with it a $1.7 trillion deficit? Use the Alinsky playbook of which the Left is so fond: freeze it, attack it, personalize it, and polarize it. You only need to distribute five or six well constructed questions. There are some questions attached here which apply to most any Democrat that is supporting the Socialist agenda.
- The voting record and questions and any relevant articles which would place the Congressperson on the defensive should be distributed to all indicating a willingness to attend. People should be asked to meet in the parking lot of the hall a half hour before the scheduled start.
- Should you seek visibility for your group voicing opposition to the Rep's voting record and agenda, you could schedule a press conference 20 minutes before the Town Hall is scheduled to begin. Write and distribute a press release to local newspapers and TV. Have someone available to read a prepared statement and answer questions. We actually issued the press release and were prepared for the conference. However, the media were following Himes and did not show up until the Town Hall started. We distributed the statement to some of the people arriving at the hall. Copies of both the press release and our statement are attached here.
Meet and Deploy
- The team should meet outside the hall with voting record and questions distributed. Everyone should be asked to use one of the questions or a similar one that boxes in the Rep. The team should also be advised to spread out inside the hall but should try to get seats in the front half. The Rep will inevitably start picking people toward the front.
- The use of protest signs outside is an option if people bring them. However, those without signs should go in the hall early enough to get good seats. Those wanting the Rep to see the signs will end up entering the hall at the last minute and will likely end up in the back with less chance to be picked for a question. Do not bring the signs into the hall if you want any chance to be picked for a question.
Inside the Hall
- Spread out in the hall and try to be in the front half. The objective is to put the Rep on the defensive with your questions and follow-up. The Rep should be made to feel that a majority, and if not, a significant portion of at least the audience, opposes the socialist agenda of Washington. They need to leave the hall with some doubts about their agenda. The other objective is to illustrate for the balance of the audience that the national leadership is acting against our founders' principles which are on the other side of the debate - and show them that there are a lot of solid citizens in the district who oppose the socialist approach to the nation's challenges. We want the independent thinkers to leave the hall with doubts about the Democrat solutions continually proposed by the national leadership.
- You need to rock-the-boat early in the Rep's presentation. Watch for an opportunity to yell out and challenge the Rep's statements early. If he blames Bush for something or offers other excuses - call him on it, yell back and have someone else follow-up with a shout-out. Don't carry on and make a scene - just short intermittent shout outs. The purpose is to make him uneasy early on and set the tone for the hall as clearly informal, and free-wheeling. It will also embolden others who agree with us to call out and challenge with tough questions. The goal is to rattle him, get him off his prepared script and agenda. If he says something outrageous, stand up and shout out and sit right down. Look for these opportunities before he even takes questions.
- When the formal Q&A session begins get all your hands up and keep them up - be persistent throughout the entire session. Keep body language neutral and look positive to improve chances of being selected. When called on, ask a specific prepared question that puts the onus on him to answer. It can be a long question including lots of statistics/facts. You will not be interrupted from reading a solid question. If you ramble on too long without a focus, you will be stopped. After the Rep answers, or more likely diverts or dodges, be prepared with a follow-up - take the initiative and you will be able to follow-up. The balance of the group should applaud when the question is asked, further putting the Rep on the defensive. If the Rep tries a particularly odious diversion, someone from the group should yell out to answer the question. These tactics will clearly rattle the Rep and illustrate some degree of his ineptness to the balance of the audience.
In Summary
When the session ends, those who asked effective questions should seek out any press remaining at the hall, providing their names for attribution - you may be quoted in the press article. If the gameplan above is implemented the resulting impact will likely be:
- A Rep and his staff set back on their heels, recognizing that people in their district can see past the charade and are angry about the socialist agenda, infringement of our liberties, and profligate spending. After a couple of these sessions one of the weaker ones may consider swaying from the party voting line.
- Audience members expecting business-as-usual go home recognizing that many of their neighbors oppose the agenda, see the dire financial impact, and see a Rep exposed to some degree as a charlatan, and put on the defensive.
- Articles appearing in the local press will amplify the above points to the local community, rather than being puff pieces for the local Representative. Two local newspaper articles about the Himes Town Hall are also attached.
We believe we achieved the desired impact with a modest amount of planning and the dedication of only a few hours to attend the event. We will be travelling the state to provide a similar reality-check for all five of the Reps, and of course Chris Dodd. Just imagine what we can achieve if we see to it that every Representative in the nation who has supported the socialist agenda has a similar experience!
In liberty,
Bob MacGuffie
I ask how can this be"? What about the nation has yielded groups of people who will actively attempt to stifle open and flowing dialog via behavior common to environments that are close to anarchy?
A quick read from Think Progress.com
Right-Wing Harassment Strategy Against Dems Detailed In Memo: 'Yell,' 'Stand Up And Shout Out,' 'Rattle Him'This morning, Politico reported that Democratic members of Congress are increasingly being harassed by "angry, sign-carrying mobs and disruptive behavior" at local town halls. For example, in one incident, right-wing protesters surrounded Rep. Tim Bishop (D-NY) and forced police officers to have to escort him to his car for safety.
This growing phenomenon is often marked by violence and absurdity. Recently, right-wing demonstrators hung Rep. Frank Kratovil (D-MD) in effigy outside of his office. Missing from the reporting of these stories is the fact that much of these protests are coordinated by public relations firms and lobbyists who have a stake in opposing President Obama's reforms.
The lobbyist-run groups Americans for Prosperity and FreedomWorks, which orchestrated the anti-Obama tea parties earlier this year, are now pursuing an aggressive strategy to create an image of mass public opposition to health care and clean energy reform. A leaked memo from Bob MacGuffie, a volunteer with the FreedomWorks website Tea Party Patriots, details how members should be infiltrating town halls and harassing Democratic members of Congress:
Tea Bagger (Party) Memo (Parenthetic 'Party' added by The Pardu..out of respect for most Tea Party Movement members))
- Artificially Inflate Your Numbers: "Spread out in the hall and try to be in the front half. The objective is to put the Rep on the defensive with your questions and follow-up. The Rep should be made to feel that a majority, and if not, a significant portion of at least the audience, opposes the socialist agenda of Washington."
- Be Disruptive Early And Often: "You need to rock-the-boat early in the Rep's presentation, Watch for an opportunity to yell out and challenge the Rep's statements early."
- Try To "Rattle Him," Not Have An Intelligent Debate: "The goal is to rattle him, get him off his prepared script and agenda. If he says something outrageous, stand up and shout out and sit right back down. Look for these opportunities before he even takes questions."
The memo above also resembles the talking points being distributed by FreedomWorks for pushing an anti-health reform assault all summer. Patients United, a front group maintained by Americans for Prosperity, is currently busing people all over the country for more protests against Democratic members. Rep. Pete Sessions (R-TX), chairman of the NRCC, has endorsed the strategy, telling the Politico the days of civil town halls are now "over."
Meanwhile, AHIP, the trade group and lobbying juggernaut representing the health insurance industry is sending staffers to monitor town halls and other right-wing front groups are stepping up their ad campaign to smear reform efforts. The strategy for defeating reform - recently outlined by an influential lobbyist to the Hill newspaper as "delay" then "kill" - is becoming apparent. By delaying a vote until after the August recess, lobbyists are now seizing upon recess town halls as opportunities to ambush lawmakers and fool them into believing there is wide opposition to reform.
"KEY Point (Out of fairness)" The Pardu
Update Amy Menefee, communications director of Americans for Prosperity and its anti-health reform group Patients United, wrote to ThinkProgress regarding this post:"Several blogs have picked up your post: http://thinkprogress.org/2009/... which mentions Americans for Prosperity's (AFP) efforts next to your mention of Bob MacGuffie's memo about town hall meetings. Mr. MacGuffie's memo was his own work. I would appreciate your help in correcting the erroneous rumor people have passed around that this memo came from AFP. We have encouraged our members to attend town halls, ask questions and register their opinions about issues including health care -- as all citizens should do. We always promote civil dialog and do not condone disruptive behavior."
As noted in the post, MacGuffie is a volunteer who actively posts and volunteers with the website Tea Party Patriots. A review of the sponsoring organizations reveals that both FreedomWorks and Americans for Prosperity are sponsors of the website as "Freedom Coalition" partners. A few months before joining Americans for Prosperity, Menefee herself worked for the medical device/pharmaceutical industry-funded "think-tank" called the Galen Institute.
OK, a long read! While the tactic certainly worked on some legislators, I ask, is it truly democratic (SMALL 'd') in principle? Is it a fair tactic for people who really want to hear what their Congressman/woman's remarks in the town hall?
|
Print Friendly View
|
