Welcome
Left Take is dedicated to showcasing the creativity, humor, and viewpoints of the progressive community. Want to post your own diary? Post a comment? Maybe get it seen by hundreds of thousands of people? It's easy. Just click "Getting Started."

Support Our Sponsors


Advertise Here
Want to advertise on LefTake? You can do it for as little as $69 a week (for tens of thousands of page views!). Click here to get started. And Click on the "Site Meter" icon just below to see our traffic.

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll

Username: SuzeB1964
PersonId: 5025
Created: September 14, 2009 1:48 PM
SuzeB1964's RSS Feed
Web Page: http://www.facebook.com/SuzeBarnes
Email: suzeb1964@yahoo.com


The Shameful Side of US Foreign Policy - Pt 2 El Salvador

by: SuzeB1964

March 11, 2010 5:51 PM

My next installment of US Foreign Policy in Latin America that just burns me up involves El Salvador. Political assassination is a recurring theme in our foreign policy, and has been particularly prevalent in El Salvador for the last 30 years, where thousands of peasants and activists have been targeted for assassination.

This is taken from Death Squads in El Salvador: A Pattern of U.S. Complicity


In 1963, the U.S. government sent 10 Special Forces personnel to El Salvador to help General Jose Alberto Medrano set up the Organizacion Democratica Nacionalista (ORDEN)-the first paramilitary death squad in that country. These Green Berets assisted in the organization and indoctrination of rural "civic" squads which gathered intelligence and carried out political assassinations in coordination with the Salvadoran military.

Now, there is compelling evidence to show that for over 30 years, members of the U.S. military and the CIA have helped organize, train, and fund death squad activity in El Salvador.

In the last eight years, six Salvadoran military deserters have publicly acknowledged their participation in the death squads. Their stories are notable because they not only confirm suspicions that the death squads are made up of members of the Salvadoran military, but also because each one implicates U.S. personnel in death squad activity.

The term "death squad" while appropriately vivid, can be misleading because it obscures their fundamental identity. Evidence shows that "death squads" are primarily military or paramilitary units carrying out political assassinations and intimidation as part of the Salvadoran government's counterinsurgency strategy. Civilian death squads do exist but have often been comprised of off-duty soldiers financed by wealthy Salvadoran businessmen.

It is important to point out that the use of death squads has been a strategy of U.S. counterinsurgency doctrine. For example, the CIA's "Phoenix Program" was responsible for the "neutralization" of over 40,000 Vietnamese suspected of working with the National Liberation Front.

Part of the U.S. counterinsurgency program was run from the Office of Public Safety (OPS). OPS was part of U.S. AID, and worked with the Defense Department and the CIA to modernize and centralize the repressive capabilities of client state police forces, including those in El Salvador. In 1974 Congress ordered the discontinuation of OPS.

In spite of the official suspension of police assistance between 1974 and 1985, CIA and other U.S . officials worked with Salvadoran security forces throughout the restricted period to centralize and modernize surveillance, to continue training, and to fund key players in the death squad network.

Even though the U.S. government's police training program had been thoroughly discredited, the Reagan administration found other channels through which to reinstate police assistance for El Salvador and Honduras. Attached to this assistance is the requirement that the president certify that aid recipients do not engage in torture, political persecution, or assassination. Even so, certain members of Congress showed concern over the reinstatement of police aid to repressive regimes. In a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, Senator Claiborne Pell (Dem.-Rhode Island) asked, "I was talking about cattle prods specifically. Would they be included or not?"

Undersecretary of State for Latin American Affair Elliott Abrams replied, "Well, I would say that in my view if the police of Costa Rica, with their democratic tradition, say that for crowd control purposes they would like to have 50 shot [sic] batons, as they are called in a non-agricultural context, I would personally want to give it to them. I think that government has earned enough trust, as I think we have earned enough trust, not to be questioned, frankly, about exporting torture equipment. But I would certainly be in favor of giving it to them if they want it."

Join The Discussion :: 0 Comments

The Shameful Side of US Foreign Policy - Pt 1 Guatemala

by: SuzeB1964

March 11, 2010 2:08 PM

Guatemala is the consummate "Banana Republic". Few know how it came to be such a mess; how it was US foreign policy that established such an inhumane political system, guilty of some of the worst human rights violations in existence. And, it was all done, so we could have cheap bananas...
This article is taken from A "killing field" in the Americas: US policy in Guatemala
The reality of Guatemala
Guatemala, with 10 million people, is the most populous country in Central America. It is run by an oligarchy of wealthy landowners and big business interests that reap the country's agricultural and commercial rewards at the expense of the rest of the population. The country has been headed by military dictators and figurehead-presidents. Ultimate control belongs to the Army.

Guatemala is a country without social or economic justice, especially for the 6 million indigenous Mayan Indians who make up the majority of the population. There is a marked disparity in income distribution, and poverty is pervasive. On coffee plantations, peasants, descendants of the ancient Maya, live in concentration camp-like conditions, as de facto slaves. 40% of the indigenous people have no access to health care, and 60% have no access to safe drinking water. Education in rural areas is non-existent, with the result that 50% of the people are illiterate. Half of the country's children suffer from malnutrition. Every day in Guatemala, a country in which everything grows, people go hungry.

The real power in Guatemala is in the hands of the Army, and that power has been used to violently control the people, resulting in the worst human rights record in the hemisphere. During more than 30 years of civil war, over 150,000 Guatemalans have been killed or disappeared, tens-of-thousands have been forced to flee to Mexico, 1 million have been displaced inside the country, and more than 440 Indian villages have been destroyed. 75,000 widows and 250,000 orphans have been produced out of the carnage. And, for more than four decades, the United States government has consistently supported the Guatemalan Army and the ruling class in their policies of repression.

United Fruit Company
Under dictator Jorqe Ubico (1931-1944), American-owned United Fruit Company (UFC) gained control of forty-two percent of Guatemala's land, and was exempted from taxes and import duties. The three main enterprises in Guatemala -- United Fruit Company, International Railways of Central America, and Empress Electrica -- were American-owned (and controlled by United Fruit Company). Seventy-seven percent of all exports went to the US and sixty-five percent of imports came from the US.

"The 10 Years of Springtime"
Repressive governments have plagued Guatemala throughout its history, with alternating waves of dictators being the rule. But, between 1945 and 1954, there was a period of enlightenment -- an experiment with democracy called the "10 Years of Springtime" -- that started with the election of Juan Jose Arevalo to the presidency.

While in power from 1945 to 1951, Arevalo established the nation's social security and health systems and a government bureau to look after Mayan concerns. Arévalo's liberal regime experienced many coup attempts by conservative military forces, but the attempts were not successful.

Arévalo was followed by Colonel Jacobo Arbenz Guzmán who became president in democratic elections in 1951. At the time, 2% of landowners owned 70% of the arable land and farm laborers were kept in debt slavery by these landowners. Arbenz continued to implement the liberal policies of Arevalo, and instituted an agrarian reform law to break up the large estates and foster individually owned small farms. The land reform program involved redistribution of 160,000 acres of uncultivated land owned by United Fruit Company. United Fruit was compensated for its land.

United Fruit, Eisenhower and the end of reform
United Fruit was a state within the Guatemalan state. It not only owned all of Guatemala's banana production and monopolized banana exports, it also owned the country's telephone and telegraph system, and almost all of the railroad track. In addition to redistributing United Fruit land, the government also began competing with United Fruit in the production and export of bananas.

Important people in the ruling circles of the US, involved with United Fruit Company, used their influence to convince the US government to step in. (Secretary of State John Foster Dulles' law firm had prepared United Fruit's contracts with Guatemala; his brother, CIA Director Allen Dulles, belonged to United Fruit's law firm; John Moors Cabot, Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs, was the brother of a former United Fruit president; President Eisenhower's personal secretary was married to the head of United Fruit's Public Relations Department.)

In 1954, Eisenhower and Dulles decided that Arbenz finally had to go, and the US State Department labeled Guatemala "communist". On this pretext, US aid and equipment were provided to the Guatemalan Army. The US also sent a CIA army and CIA planes. They bombed a military base and a government radio station, and overthrew Arbenz Guzmán, who fled to Cuba.

The coup restored the stranglehold on the Guatemalan economy of both the landed elite and US economic interests. President Eisenhower was willing to make the poor, illiterate Guatemalan peasants pay in hunger and torture for supporting land reform, and for trying to attain a better future for themselves and their families. In order to ensure ever-increasing profits for an American corporation, the US State Department, the CIA, and United Fruit Company had succeeded in taking freedom and land from Guatemala's peasants, unions from its workers, and hope for a democratic Guatemala from all of its people.

Aided by the US, Colonel Castillo Armas became the new president. The US Ambassador furnished Armas with lists of radical opponents to be eliminated, and the bloodletting promptly began. Under Armas, thousands were arrested and many were tortured and killed. United Fruit got all its land back. As an extra present, the Banana Worker's Union was banned. Armas disenfranchised one-third of the voters by barring illiterates from voting. He outlawed all political parties, labor confederations, and peasant organizations. He closed down opposition newspapers and burned "subversive" books. The "Springtime" had ended.

Dictators and repression
The coup in Guatemala inaugurated an era of military rule in Central America. Generals and Colonels acted with impunity to wipe out dissent and garner wealth for themselves and their friends. And, the killing of defenseless people became state policy in Guatemala. Between 1954 and 1981, more than 60,000 people were murdered. Guatemala continues to suffer the worst record of human rights abuses in Latin America.

The Armas regime was followed by a succession of repressive military dictatorships. As both protest and repression became more violent, civil war emerged, especially in the highlands. Industrialization in the 1960s and '70s helped the rich get richer, while the cities became increasingly squalid as the rural dispossessed fled the countryside to find urban employment. The military continued its violent suppression of anti-government elements, especially in the countryside, among the indigenous Mayan population, resistance grew, and a guerrilla army began to form.

The Green Berets, the CIA, and death squads
During the 1960s and 70s, American military aid and training made Guatemala's army the strongest and most sophisticated in Central America. Between 1966 - 68, during the Johnson presidency, the Green Berets were sent to Guatemala to transform its Army into a modern counter-insurgency force and to conduct a Vietnam -style war there. This is the origin of the killing machine that operates in Guatemala today.

Death squads, never before seen in Latin America, were started during this period. Army leaders, government officials, and the businessmen who supported and often bankrolled the death squads, had close ties with many US administrations. The squads had lists of people that were suspected communists, or who opposed the existing system of elite-corporate-Army control. Those on the lists were hunted down and killed.

The US mission and its advisors prodded the military to take measures to establish a US base for counterinsurgency (counter-revolutionary) actions, in order to maintain cheap labor for the landowners and US corporations, and to preserve the System. Terror was the weapon, and the American CIA was the agent. Targeting guerrillas, peasants, students, labor leaders, and professionals, the Guatemalan military jailed thousands. And thousands more, struggling to overcome poverty and injustice, were murdered or disappeared by the police, the army, and the death squads, all armed and trained by the CIA.

Journalists, lawyers, teachers, members of opposition parties, and anyone who expressed sympathy for the anti-government cause were machine-gunned. Anyone attempting to organize a union or improve the lot of the peasants was subject to torture, mutilation, and death. Men were found decapitated or castrated. Some had their eyes gouged-out, their testicles cut off and put in their mouths, their hands or tongues cut off; women had their breasts cut off. Electric shock to the genitals was routinely used, with equipment and instructions supplied by the CIA. American planes and pilots, flying out of Panama, dropped napalm on suspected targets.

By the end of 1968, the guerrillas had been wiped out. For the Pentagon it had been a limited war; for the Guatemalans the war had been total.

The CIA, the Guatemalan G-2, and Israel
But, the war did not end with victory over the guerrillas. Since the 1960s, the CIA has had links with a Guatemalan Army unit -- the G-2 -- that maintains a network of torture centers and body dumps throughout Guatemala and has killed thousands of Guatemalan civilians. Operating out of the US Embassy, CIA undercover agents, secretly working with the G-2 -- a group of 2,000 elite Guatemalan Army Intelligence officers -- have trained, advised, armed, and equipped these officers to torture, assassinate and disappear thousands of Guatemalan dissidents. Some G-2 bases have their own crematoriums where the tortured and murdered are disposed of.

In the 1970s, international publicity revealed the pattern of torture and killing, and public reports exposed the Guatemalan Army as the most repressive in Latin America. This series of events resulted in a change in human rights sentiment in the US. In 1977, US President Jimmy Carter cut off overt military aid. However, money and arms still got to there -- through the CIA. When President Lucas Garcia began his fearsome regime in 1978, and set out to eliminate all the new popular leaders by either murdering or coopting them, and when death squads roamed the land and murdered at will, the CIA was there to help.

In addition to US and CIA support, Argentina, and Chile provided expertise and aid to Guatemala's military. And, Israel has played a very important role in Guatemala since 1977, supplying weapons, building munitions factories, and training soldiers.

Reagan and Rios Montt
The 1980s was marked by barbaric repression and the massacre of the indigenous population. A succession of elected dictators, supported by the US, left suffering in their wake. Because of the notoriety that again developed from reports of human rights violations by the Guatemalan Army, President Reagan changed the US policy of overt aid to the Guatemalan Army to a two- track policy. While government spokespersons made public pronouncements in support of human rights and the return to civilian rule, the Reagan Administration signaled to the Guatemalan Army its approval for winning the war, and it lobbied Congress for more aid. The CIA continued to work with Guatemala's security forces.

General Efrain Rios Montt, a graduate of the School of the Americas (SOA), at Fort Benning, Georgia, came to power in a 1982 coup. Praised as a "born-again" Christian reformer, in truth he was one of the most savage of Guatemalan dictators. His "Beans and Rifles" program was designed to keep guerrillas out of Indian villages -- beans for those who cooperated, rifles for those who didn't. He declared a "state of siege", and on television, he stated that he had "declared a state of siege so that we could kill legally". He banned public meetings, suspended the constitution, replaced elected officials, and censored the press. He also instituted Civil Defense Patrols (PACs) to control the population.

Rios Montt moved the war from urban centers to the countryside where "the spirit of the lord" guided him against "communist subversives', mostly indigenous Indians. As Guatemalans suffered torture, kidnappings, and massacres at the hands of the government, he presented himself as the savior of the population. Using the lessons he had learned at the SOA, he implemented a "pacification" program similar to that used by the US in Vietnam, intended to give the impression that the government wanted to reestablish democracy in the country. In reality, as the "pacification" program moved from village to village, it essentially established concentration camps populated by those who had been able to survive the massacres and political genocide which the government itself carried out.

During the 17 months of Rios Montt's "Christian" campaign, 400 villages were destroyed, 10 - 20,000 Indians were killed, and over 100,000 fled to Mexico. Early in 1983, President Reagan resumed military shipments to Guatemala, claiming that Montt's program against the guerrilla insurgency was working. He said that Montt was given a "bum rap" on human rights.

Montt was overthrown in August, 1983. In December, 1985 Vinicio Cerezo Arevalo, a civilian who campaigned as a populist reformer, was elected president. But, the Army continued to have the power. Cerezo disbanded the secret police (DIT), but assassinations of students, peasants, and human rights activists continued through the Army's G-2, with CIA assistance.

The Reagan administration and the death squads
Before his administration took office in 1980, President Reagan courted the Guatemalan right, whose views he shared. He promised then-president of Guatemala General Romeo Lucas Garcia and leaders of the right, a 180 degree turn in US policy toward their country. The agreement provided for the restoration of US weapons sales, the curtailment of State Department criticism of human rights violations, and the promise that the US would intervene militarily in the event of a popular uprising. The assurances by Reagan may have led the Guatemalan government officials who ran the death squads to feel confident that the US would support their activities. The death squads were staffed and directed by the Guatemalan Army and Police under the command of President Lucas. Private businessmen paid the salaries and often assisted in compiling lists of potential victims -- usually student, labor, professional, and political leaders.

The significant increase in the number of death squad assassinations -- including the assassination of 34 of the top leadership of the moderate Christian Democratic Party -- that took place after Reagan took office, may have been a direct result of his assurances to the Guatemalan right. In February 1981, Amnesty International, reporting on massive human rights violations in Guatemala, attributed nearly 6,000 deaths to the Lucas Gracia government in less than three years, many of them at the hands of death squads. The attendance of Mario Sandoval Alarcon, considered to be the high commander of the Guatemalan death squads, at the Reagan inauguration, reveals the close relationship that existed between the Guatemalan rulers and the Reagan administration.

The war on drugs, the US National Guard, and the indigenous people
Near the end of the Reagan administration, another technique for repression was used -- the war on drugs. While the program had no significant impact on drug production and trafficking, it had serious consequences for indigenous Guatemalans. The spraying of lethal herbicides by anti-drug helicopters and planes caused widespread damage, poisoning large numbers of people, animals, fish, and plants. To escape government violence, some of the tens-of-thousands of indigenous internal refugees in Guatemala at that time, banded together in remote areas. In the name of its anti-drug policy, the government bombed these areas, captured much of the population, and tortured and killed many of them.

In 1989, the Bush administration, under the guise of humanitarian aid, sent National Guard units to Guatemala to provide medical services. They served in areas where the guerrilla movement was the strongest. According to villagers, a visit from the National Guard units sometimes bore more of a resemblance to police interrogations than to medical examinations. As villagers were getting "humanitarian" help, they were questioned about the type of organizations they had, who their leaders were, and what type of people visited their community.

The DeVine case
In 1990, MIchael DeVine, an American businessman living in Guatemala, apparently stumbled upon the Guatemalan Army's drug-trafficking activities. He was kidnapped and murdered. In response, President George Bush cut off military aid to Guatemala and publicly criticized the Army. But, Reagan's two-track policy was still in effect, so Bush continued to send CIA funds to the military to allow them to continue their war, and strengthened the ties between the CIA and the Guatemalan Army.

Under recent presidents, Guatemala's Civil Defense Patrols (PACs) continued a campaign of domination and terror against civilians, especially the indigenous population. Forced military conscription, kidnappings, death threats, and assassinations continued with impunity.

Join The Discussion :: 4 Comments

15 years of Right Wing Extremism and Domestic Terrorism

by: SuzeB1964

February 19, 2010 2:35 PM

I found this article on a Newsweek blog, and it got me to thinking about recent history and the nature of domestic terrorism.  Here is the article itself: http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs... What most concerns me is the excerpt below:
Groups that track extreme right-wing violence say they see a definitive spike in activity. "This attack comes in the context of an absolute explosion in militias and the larger antigovernment 'patriot' movements in the last 12 to 18 months," says Mark Potok, director of the Intelligence Project at the Southern Poverty Law Center. "This has been driven initially by nonwhite immigration for the last 10 years, which is reflected in the person of Barack Obama, which represents a very real and irreversible demographic change. Second, the economy has played a role. Unemployment has stayed high. There's a huge amount of anger about bonuses for bankers, at the same time that most middle-class and working-class Americans don't see things getting better, and in fact getting worse."

In a  report tracing far-right terror between the Oklahoma City bombings and fall 2009, SPLC found six cases of attacks targeting the Internal Revenue Service. More important,12 of the 75 overall incidents documented have happened since Obama's election, or else happened prior but involved Obama (as a motive or a target) anyway. Potok says the level of violence is reaching levels last seen during the 1990s, when a wave of militias arose-especially in states like Montana and Michigan-of people who believed they needed to protect themselves from the government.


In 15 years, there have been 75 cases of extreme right wing terrorism in this country.  75!!! And, 1/6 of these have been tied in some way to President Obama.

That is a very disturbing statistic, because it is a huge spike in domestic terror in just the first year of his presidency. How much worse is it going to get, and when is the spark going to set off the powder keg of hate?  Will it be backlash from Ft Hood, Joe Stack or some, as yet, unspecified act of terror in the near future? We have all seen images of the nut jobs carrying their guns to the town hall meetings and protests. We have all seen the hatemongers on Faux Noise glibly egging on their audience to commit violence.

For more info on Domestic Terrorism and hate crimes, check out:

There's More... :: 10 Comments, 124 words in story

Buh-Bayh!

by: SuzeB1964

February 16, 2010 2:18 PM

OK, believe it or not, I used to really like Evan Bayh, so much so that I had hoped he would be Obama's pick for veep.  But, in the months since the election, he has done nothing but piss me off, essentially opposing everything that the Democratic party stood for.  However, on the issues page of his senate web site, he claimed to be FOR everything. http://bayh.senate.gov/issues/ WTF? Lying SOB.

Now, he has committed the consummate traitorous act for his party by basically saying he was taking his marbles and going home.  He will not seek re-election.  I am glad for that, but his timing seriously SUX. He waited until the day before the deadline for getting the petitions in before announcing, making the Dems scramble to get a decent candidate in.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21...

Join The Discussion :: 16 Comments

Bipartisanship, at long last

by: SuzeB1964

February 11, 2010 1:32 PM

Looks like some members of both parties in the Senate have finally realized that without some cooperation between them, this country is essentially ungovernable.

Senator Max Baucus (D Mont) and Senator Chuck Grassley (R Iowa) have proposed a new jobs bill that will give employer's tax breaks for hiring out of work employees.
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes...

Senator Chris Dodd (D Conn) and Senator Bob Corker (R Tenn) have restarted the negotiations for financial reform.  To do this, Dodd had to turn away from Senator Richard Shelby (R Ala), with whom talks were at an impasse.
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes...

Senator Corker has also been working with Mark Warner (D Vir) on a proposal that will handle dismantling corporations that are deemed "too big to fail".  

Let's hope that both sides are finally going to grow up a little, so that something good can come out of the Senate.

Join The Discussion :: 22 Comments

Be afraid, be very afraid

by: SuzeB1964

February 08, 2010 11:22 AM

People see Sarah Palin, and (the intelligent ones among us) think that she is entirely too stupid to ever get elected to the highest office in the land.  Sadly, I think we are mistaken. Allow me to explain.

1) We have all seen what a rabid following she has among the wingnuts. Her popularity continues to grow with these types, and now that she is on Faux Noise with some regularity, she will be in the public eye more and more. Her 15 minutes of fame has been extended into perpetuity.

2) The Supreme(ly conservative-owned/traitorous) Court has made it permissable for corporations to essentially buy elections. And, which corporations have the most money to spend on elections?  (Ooh! Ooh! I know the answer to this one!) That would be big oil, pharma and insurance companies.  How can we forget the war cries of "Drill, baby, drill" and "They want to kill your grannie with Obamacare!"? I think it is pretty safe to assume that these 3 industries are likely to pour significant funds into conservative coffers in 2012.

3) There is an article in the NYT today showing that Wall Street is now investing in the wingnuts.

Thus, the money is going way right, and those of us on the left will be here, shaking our heads and wondering what the fuck just happened?  It will be the exact same reaction I had in 2004 when Dubya was re-elected.  I kept thinking, "People now know what a moron this guy is. The Dem candidate is a shoe-in." Well, we all remember what happened then.

I truly believe that we will all be fucked in the next election, and not in the good way. I am personally wondering how difficult it would be to emigrate to Denmark before then. I wonder if I can learn Danish in 3 years...

Join The Discussion :: 18 Comments

What's wrong with this picture?

by: SuzeB1964

November 22, 2009 10:34 PM

There is an article on MSNBC.com today about how local governments are going broke paying back loans to the big investment bankers on Wall Street. Loans were made using the good old derivitive formulas, and now, these bankers are preparing to collect on that bad debt. To cover these debts, local governments are having to use funds that would otherwise go towards education, transportation and other services. Yes, these are the same blood-sucking banks that received billions in TARP money, and are now raking in billions in revenue. W T F?

It is high time the federal government step in and say:
"Sorry, but we are cancelling these loans effective immediately. Suck it up and deal with it. Oh, we are also immediately taxing your business at 100% of your profit margin, and using that money to assist homeowners in foreclosure with paying back their loans. Again, sux to be you."

Join The Discussion :: 7 Comments

Dumb & Dumber?

by: SuzeB1964

November 19, 2009 7:13 PM

Sarah Palin has apparently hinted at who her choice for a running mate would be in 2012.  Yes, ladies and gentlemen, it's true.  She's hinting at selecting Genn Beck.

Palin-Beck 2012?
During Her Book Tour, Sarah Palin Hints at Possibility of 2012 Run With Fox News Host Glenn Beck

(AP)  Sarah Palin has suggested Fox News firebrand Glenn Beck could be someone she'd consider as a running mate if she makes a bid for the White House in two years.

"I can envision a couple of different combinations, if ever I were to be in a position to really even seriously consider running for anything in the future, and I'm not there yet," Palin told the conservative news agency Newsmax as she promoted her memoir, "Going Rogue: An American Life."

"But Glenn Beck I have great respect for. He's a hoot. He gets his message across in such a clever way. And he's so bold - I have to respect that. He calls it like he sees it, and he's very, very, very effective."

Does anyone else feel like they have just crossed over into the Twilight Zone?

Join The Discussion :: 14 Comments

So, I heard on the radio this am about the WBC, and a protest they are having

by: SuzeB1964

November 10, 2009 2:30 PM

Apparently the Westboro Baptist Church in Topeka, KS, run by freakazoid Fred Phelps, is having a protest here in St Louis on Thursday at a local high school.  This school is being targeted by this radical anti-gay group because a soldier who was killed in Afghanistan went to that high school, and the school sponsors various diversity programs.

OK, anti-gay AND anti-war?  That sounds even crazier than the average conservative whack job.  I just had to wiki this church.  I gotta tell ya, these folks make Sarah (Eye em sofa king wee tar dead) Palin look perfectly rational!  If you want to see the REAL lunatic fringe in this country, click here.  Their list of websites includes:
   GodHatesFags.com
   GodHatesAmerica.com
   GodHatesIreland.com
   GodHatesSweden.com
   GodHatesAustralia.com
   GodHatesCanada.com
Apparently, God only loves the Westboro Baptist Church members, whose membership has about 70 members, 60 of which are related to Freddie-boy.

Now, for some good news.  There is a counter-protest going to occur at the same time in a churchyard across the street to get these nutjobs the hell out of this town.  

Protest the war all you want (I am anti-war), and hate gays if you are really that bass-ackwards (I am pro-LBGT), but do NOT protest (using your right to freedom of speech) at the memorial of a young man who DIED fighting in this war.  Have a little respect for the people who gave their lives defending that right, even if the war itself is a total clusterfuck.

Join The Discussion :: 25 Comments

The Impact of the Lunatic Fringe

by: SuzeB1964

November 09, 2009 1:13 PM

In the New York Times today, Paul Krugman published an editorial that warns how the far right wing is damaging the political process in this country. Essentially, while we all watch their insanity in amazement, they are still managing to prevent any real reforms from occurring.  Excellent read.  I strongly recommend.

Paranoia Strikes Deep

Join The Discussion :: 4 Comments

PETITION TO SENATE DEMOCRATS

by: SuzeB1964

November 05, 2009 9:56 PM

OK, I cannot really add anything to this except to say:
SIGN THE PETITION!

How many times have you heard DC pundits say that Senate Democrats from "conservative states" can't support the public option because their constituents don't want them to?

We teamed up with Democracy for America to debunk that conventional wisdom -- commissioning our own polls in the states of Sens. Ben Nelson (D-NE), Blanche Lincoln (D-AR), and Evan Bayh (D-IN).

And guess what? Voters consistently want the public option! Rachel Maddow covered our polls on her MSNBC show this week.

There are no excuses left for Democratic senators to oppose reform. Can you sign our petition telling them so?

Over 120,000 Americans have signed our petition so far -- demanding that the Senate Democrats hold accountable Joe Lieberman, Ben Nelson, or anyone else who helps Republicans block a vote on health care.

(Lieberman said again that he may help Republicans kill health reform -- and that he will campaign for Republicans in 2010! He's out of control, and needs to be held accountable.)

Our goal is 150,000 signatures before we deliver our petitions to Senate offices in DC. Our last petition delivery to the Senate got major national media attention -- and the more signatures we have, the bigger our impact will be.

Can you help us get to 150,000 signatures before our delivery event? Click here to sign.

Then, please forward this to others. Thanks for being a bold progressive.

--Adam Green, Stephanie Taylor, Aaron Swartz, Brian Bills, Michael Snook, and the PCCC team


Join The Discussion :: 9 Comments

November Reunion

by: SuzeB1964

November 02, 2009 2:56 PM

For those of you who, like me, worked on the Campaign for Change, reunion events are being held all over the country.  You can search for an event to attend here:

http://my.barackobama.com/page...

Attend a November Reunion Event
One year ago, President-Elect Obama told us that the election victory was only the beginning of the change we all sought -- and today, through Organizing for America, we're fighting just as hard to make health insurance reform a reality, this year. But while we seek to live up to the President's words, we're planning to gather together to reconnect, celebrate, and remember that moment, last year, when we won a historic victory.

So this week, we're holding reunion events across the country for folks who were involved in the campaign. Can you attend one near you?

Join The Discussion :: 4 Comments

OK, time for something different...and musical

by: SuzeB1964

November 01, 2009 2:30 PM

You know how sometimes you hear a song on the radio, and it makes you think of someone.  Well, here are some song lyrics that make me think of my friends and acquaintances here on LefTake.  Hope that you are not offended.  If you are, feel free to blast me.  I can take it, and it is always interesting to know what others are thinking about you.

There's More... :: 16 Comments, 891 words in story

Programmatic changes I would like to see implemented on this site

by: SuzeB1964

October 30, 2009 2:00 PM

Dear Left Take admin,
While I realize that you are no doubt otherwise occupied, I would like to suggest a few enhancements to this site.

First and foremost, I would like to request the ability to select a user on the site, and click "ignore", such that I would no longer be subjected to his/her infantile rants.  There are certain users who are so prolific with their diaries and comments that do nothing more than annoy me, that it is becoming difficult to sift through to the content that does matter to me.

Secondly, while profanity does not bother me in the least, I would like to request the ability to filter out profanity with a simple character switch, ie replacing the word "fuck" with "####".  This should be a purely optional setting for each user to decide upon whether or not they wish to view what they consider to be profane.

Thirdly, and I know you have received this request multiple times, I would like to have the ability to edit comments that I post.  While I do attempt to validate spelling and grammar on my posts prior to making them, I do find that I have made simple typographical mistakes on occasion.

Warm Regards,
Suze

There's More... :: 54 Comments, 21 words in story

A little bit of this, a little bit of that

by: SuzeB1964

October 28, 2009 9:45 PM

President Obama signed the anti-hate crimes bill into law today.  This is the first major piece of legislation created to protect gay rights.  I'm still waiting to hear how many conservative's heads exploded when they heard the news.


Franken's Amendment, which would stop funding for defense contractors who refuse to allow assault victims their day in court, passed by 68 - 30 earlier this month.  You can probably guess the political affiliation of those that voted against the amendment.  This is now satirized (rather well, actually) in a new blog called Republicans for Rape.
It looks like part of the Defense appropriations bill that was signed today includes pay offs for Taliban members.  That used to be called Green Mail, and was considered unethical, but it worked in Iraq, so maybe it will work in Afghanistan.
In a tragedy in Canada today, coyotes attacked and killed a singer.  Sadly, the singer was not Celine Dion.

Join The Discussion :: 2 Comments

Joe Leiberman needs to go NOW

by: SuzeB1964

October 27, 2009 10:16 PM

He continues to double-cross the party that took him back after he campaigned for John McCain, and also allowed him to hold onto his choice committee chair (Homeland Security).  He double-crossed the Democratic party again today by threatening to join the Repugnicans in a filibuster of health care reform if it includes the public option.  W T F.  

The Huffington Post has an excellent slideshow detailing the times he has stabbed Democrats in the back, in order to further his own goals.
Top 15 Lieberman Betrayals: Joe's Worst Double-Crosses

Join The Discussion :: 7 Comments

Funny stuff...time to lighten up folks!

by: SuzeB1964

October 26, 2009 10:06 PM







Join The Discussion :: 5 Comments

Maureen Dowd is my hero

by: SuzeB1964

October 26, 2009 12:59 PM

Daisy Chain of Cheneys
Maureen Dowd
Published: October 13, 2009

I imagine that if you called the new consulting firm of Cheney, Cheney & Cheney and got put on hold, you'd hear the "Ghostbusters" theme:

"If there's someone weak,
if you've sprung a leak,
if the world looks bleak,
if you hide and seek,
who ya gonna call?
OBAMABUSTERS!"

It's hard to believe that the Bush dynasty, which limped away in disgrace after smashing our economy and the globe, has spawned another political dynasty.

But Jason Horowitz reported in The Washington Post that Mary Cheney, the younger daughter of the former vice president, is starting a consulting firm modeled on Kissinger Associates.

Since it involves the Cheneys, it's shrouded in unnecessary secrecy. But Mary's friends say her plan is to make it Cheney cubed, bringing in her dad and big sister, Liz, when those two finish cleaning out the Augean stables of Dick Cheney's legacy for his memoir.

Horowitz wrote that Mary, who is expecting her second child with her partner, Heather Poe, next month, may be hanging the shingle for the "gruff clan who speak in dour unison when bashing the current president, second-guessing the previous commander in chief and chiding wayward G.O.P. leaders."

The influence-peddling firm will be wildly successful, no doubt, because if anyone has shown a golden touch, it's Dick Cheney. And there are bound to be oodles of clients who want coaching on how to make things look totally the opposite of what they are.

Saudis, right-wing dictators and Bernie Madoff calling for image makeovers? Scooter Libby calling to see how to get his career back after taking the fall for his scheming boss? Rush Limbaugh calling to strategize about how to buy an N.F.L. team with black players as he says offensive things about blacks? Rupert Murdoch seeking tips on how to merge Fox and NBC into Brian O'Hannity?

You can hear a receptionist chirping: "Cheney, Cheney & Cheney. Who would you like to target today?"

Regarding bipartisanship with the same contempt as multilateralism and multiculturalism, the Cheneys have led the charge against Obama, painting him as a wishy-washy loser who has turned America to mush. On Fox News last Sunday, Liz Cheney - who still talks about having "liberated" Iraq - called Obama's Nobel Peace Prize a "farce" and suggested that he "send the mother of a fallen American soldier to accept the prize on behalf of the U.S. military."

The blonde 43-year-old lawyer, a mother of five hailed by her fans as "a red state rock star," teamed up this week with Bill Kristol to start a new group called "Keep America Safe." Kristol, of course, was the chief proponent of the wacky notion that Dan Quayle, and later Sarah Palin, could Keep America Safe, which somewhat undermines the urgency and gravity of the group's moniker.

And Liz's dear old dad was the one who made America less safe by straining our military to the breaking point while carrying out his knuckleheaded theory of pre-emptive war. Still, Liz hopes her new enterprise will energize opponents of President Obama's "radical" foreign policy, as she has tried to do so volubly on cable shows, and raise money by presenting the president as a callow, wobbly, golf-playing appeaser whose foreign policy will "make us weaker."

The Web site features a daily Willie Hortonish detainee feature, profiling one of the scary swarthy prisoners at Gitmo. And it will also have all kinds of fun reading, like memos by Bush lawyers on enhanced interrogation. (Or, as it's more commonly known outside the gargoyled gates of Cheneyville, torture.)

The "Keep America Safe" mission statement says that "the current administration too often seems uncertain, wishful, irresolute, and unwilling to stand up for America, our allies and our interests."

It's evocative of an earlier effort by conservatives to prod a Democratic president to man-up, hectoring him about his "inadequate" foreign policy and his course of "weakness and drift."

That was a 1998 letter to President Bill Clinton from the Project for the New American Century, with signers such as Kristol, Paul Wolfowitz, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Perle and John Bolton, urging a strategy that "should aim, above all, at the removal of Saddam Hussein's regime from power." (Dick Cheney and Scooter Libby signed the project's statement of principles.)

Kristol joked to Politico's Ben Smith that the venture might serve as a launching pad for Liz to run for office. (A Senate bid from Virginia, where she lives, or Wyoming, which she still calls home?)

That raises the terrifying specter that some day we could see a Palin-Cheney ticket, promoted by Kristol.

Sarah would bring her content-free crackle and gut instincts; Liz would bring facts and figures distorted by ideology. Pretty soon, we're pre-emptively invading Iran and the good times are rolling all over again.  

Join The Discussion :: 3 Comments

Isms defined

by: SuzeB1964

October 23, 2009 1:38 PM

Since the trolls do not seem to have dictionaries at their disposal, I am submitting a list of definitions of political ideologies.

What I find the most amusing of these ideologies is that Republicanism started out as Radicalism, which was considered far-left for "redistribution of property and freedom of the press".  

Reagan is probably spinning in his grave right at this minute.

And Fascist?  That describes Cheney to a "T".


There's More... :: 8 Comments, 531 words in story

Stay off FOX

by: SuzeB1964

October 23, 2009 9:02 AM

All year, FOX has worked 24/7 to block President Obama's agenda-repeating lies about "death panels," promoting Tea Party protests, and whipping up fake political scandals.1

Now, President Obama is fighting back. The White House communications director said FOX is a "wing of the Republican Party...let's not pretend they're a news network."2 To draw attention to its biased coverage, President Obama will not appear on FOX for the rest of this year.3

It's about time Democrats stood up to FOX! Can you sign this petition asking Democrats to support President Obama's stance by staying off FOX as long as he does?
http://civic.moveon.org/foxobama/

A compiled petition with your individual comment will be presented to Democratic senators and representatives.

The petition says: "Democrats should support President Obama's effort to call out FOX. Please stay off FOX for as long as he does."

Democrats often appear on FOX in hopes of reaching out to conservative viewers. But FOX cuts off their mic, distorts what they say, or runs biased headlines at the bottom of the screen.4 In the end, Democrats always lose on FOX.

FOX insists there's a difference between its news shows and its right-wing opinion shows with Glenn Beck, Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, and others.

But in August, FOX's so-called news shows "aired 22 clips of town hall meeting attendees opposed" to Obama's health care plans and zero in support. CNN and MSNBC were more fair and balanced.5

In another "news" story, FOX passed off a GOP press release as its own research-typo and all.6

FOX executives now describe the channel as "the voice of opposition" to Obama's agenda. FOX president Roger Ailes-a former adviser to Nixon, Reagan, and George H.W. Bush-said, "I see this as the Alamo."7

But a Capitol Hill newspaper reports, "In the House and Senate, Democrats who pledged to follow the administration's near-boycott of Fox were hard to find, although many expressed support for Obama's stance."8

Democrats will only find the courage to join Obama if they hear from enough concerned voters.
http://civic.moveon.org/foxobama

Thanks for all you do.

-Noah, Nita, Michael, Kat, and the rest of the team

Sources:
1. "Fox News viewers overwhelmingly misinformed about health care reform proposals," Think Progress, August 19, 2009
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=8488...

"Fox News Signs On To Tea Party Agenda, Aggressively Promotes Anti-Obama Protests," Think Progress, April 10, 2009
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=8488...

"Beck-led Fox News "czar" witch hunt moves to ridiculous smear of Anita Dunn," Media Matters for America, October 16, 2009
http://mediamatters.org/resear...

2. "White House: Fox News 'a wing of the Republican Party'," New York Daily News, October 12, 2009
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=8488...

3. "The Battle Between the White House and Fox News," The New York Times, October 17, 2009
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=8489...

4. "Outfoxed: Fox News technique: cut their mic!" Brave New Films, May 11, 2007
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

"The Case Against FOX," FOXAttacks.com
http://foxattacks.com/facts.php

5. "Fox News' town hall coverage amplifies opponents of health care reform, ignores supporters," Media Matters for America, September 8, 2009
http://mediamatters.org/print/...

6. "Fox passes off GOP press release as its own research-typo and all," Media Matters for America, February 10, 2009
http://mediamatters.org/resear...

7. "'Voice of the opposition': Fox News openly advocates against Democratic Congress, White House," Media Matters for America, September 11, 2009
http://mediamatters.org/report...

8. "Congressional Democrats defend the White House's snub of Fox News," The Hill, October 14, 2009
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=8489...

Join The Discussion :: 5 Comments

Next >>
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Active Users
Currently 7 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox